14. Appendix: A collection of results which are needed in the proof.
14.1. Results from class field theory
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
The maximal unramified extension K^{un} in a given algebraic closure of K
is Galois over K with Galois group "canonically" isomorphic to
\widehat{\Z} in two ways; one of these two isomorphisms identifies
1\in\widehat{\Z} with an arithmetic Frobenius, the endomorphism inducing
x\mapsto x^q on the residue field of K^{un}, where q is the size of
the residue field of K. The other identifies 1 with geometric Frobenius,
defined to be the inverse of arithmetic Frobenius.
- Theorem 14.1
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Theorem 14.1.
The topological group described above is called the Weil group of K.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.2.
If K is a finite extension of \Q_p, then there are two canonical
isomorphisms of topological abelian groups between K^\times and the
abelianization of the Weil group of K.
This is the main theorem of local class field theory; see for example the relevant articles in the cited class-field-theory references or many other places.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If M is finite then the cohomology groups H^i(G_K,M) are all finite.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If M is torsion then H^i(G_K,M)=0 if i>2.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
H^2(G_K,\mu_n) is canonically isomorphic to \Z/n\Z.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If \mu=\bigcup_{n\geq1}\mu_n and M':=\Hom(M,\mu) is the dual of M,
then for 0\leq i\leq 2 the cup-product pairing
H^i(G_K,M)\times H^{2-i}(G_K,M')\to H^2(G_K,\mu)=\Q/\Z is perfect.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If h^i(M) denotes the order of H^i(G_K,M), then
h^0(M)-h^1(M)+h^2(M)=0.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Theorem 14.3.
If N is a finite extension of \Q then there are two "canonical"
isomorphisms of topological groups between the profinite abelian groups
\pi_0(\A_N^\times/N^\times) and \Gamma_N^{ab}; one sends local
uniformisers to arithmetic Frobenii and the other to geometric Frobenii; each
of the global isomorphisms is compatible with the local isomorphisms above.
This is the main theorem of global class field theory; see for example Tate's article in the cited reference.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Theorem 14.9.
Let S be a finite set of places of a number field K. For each v \in S
let L_v/K_v be a finite Galois extension. Then there is a finite solvable
Galois extension L/K such that if w is a place of L dividing v \in S,
then L_w/K_v is isomorphic to L_v/K_v as a K_v-algebra. Moreover, if
K^{\avoid}/K is any finite extension then L can be chosen linearly
disjoint from K^{\avoid}.
14.2. Structures on the points of an affine variety.
All rings and algebras in this section are commutative with a 1, and all
morphisms send 1 to 1.
Let X = \Spec(A) be an affine scheme of finite type over a field K. For
example X could be an affine algebraic variety; in fact we shall only be
interested in smooth affine varieties in the applications, but the initial
definition and theorem are fine for all finite type schemes.
If R is any K-algebra then one can talk about the R-points X(R) of X,
which in this case naturally bijects with the K-algebra homomorphisms from
A to R.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If X is an affine scheme of finite type over K, and if R is a K-algebra
which is also a topological ring, then we define a topology on the R-points
X(R) of X by embedding the K-algebra homomorphisms from A to R into
the set-theoretic maps from A to R with its product topology, and giving it
the subspace topology.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If X is as above and X \to \mathbb{A}^n_K is a closed immersion, then the
induced map from X(R) with its topology as above to R^n is an embedding of
topological spaces (that is, a homeomorphism onto its image).
This uses Definition 14.11.
See Conrad's notes.
We now specialise to the smooth case. I want to make the following conjectural definition:
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Let K be a field equipped with an isomorphism to the reals, complexes, or a
finite extension of the p-adic numbers. Let X be a smooth affine algebraic
variety over K. Then the points X(K) naturally inherit the structure of a
manifold over K.
Probably this is fine for a broader class of fields K.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If X is as in the previous definition and X \to \mathbb{A}^n_K is a closed
immersion, then the induced map from X(K) with its manifold structure to
K^n is an embedding of manifolds.
This uses Definition 14.13.
I'm assuming this is standard, if true.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
If G is an affine algebraic group of finite type over K=\R or K=\bbC
then G(K) is naturally a real or complex Lie group.
This uses Theorem 14.14.
The corollary, for sure, is true! And it's all we need. I have not yet made
any serious effort to find a reference for the definition or independence,
although there seem to be some ideas here.
As a toy example, one can embed \GL_n(\R) into either \R^{n^2+1} via
M \mapsto (M,\det(M)^{-1}) or into \R^{2n^2} via M \mapsto (M,M^{-1})
and the claim is that the two induced manifold structures are the same.
14.3. Algebraic groups.
The concept of an affine algebraic group over a field K can be implemented in
Lean as a commutative Hopf algebra over K, as a group object in the category
of affine schemes over K, as a representable group functor on the category of
affine schemes over K, or as a representable group functor on the category of
schemes over K which is represented by an affine scheme. All of these are the
same to mathematicians but different to Lean and some thought should go into
which of these should be the actual definition, and which should be proved to
be the same thing as the definition.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
An affine algebraic group G of finite type over a field k is said to be
connected if it is connected as a scheme, and reductive if G_{\overline{k}}
has no nontrivial smooth connected unipotent normal k-subgroup.
14.4. Automorphic forms and representations
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
A function f : G(N_\infty)\to\bbC is slowly-increasing if there exist some
C>0 and n\geq1 such that |f(x)|\leq C||x||_\rho^n.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.17.
This is independent of the choice of \rho as above.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Theorem 14.18, Definition 14.16, Corollary 14.15, and Theorem 14.12.
An automorphic form is a function \phi:G(\A_N)\to\bbC satisfying the
following conditions.
-
\phiis locally constant onG(\A_N^f)andC^\inftyonG(N_\infty). In other words, for everyg_\infty,\phi(-,g_\infty)is locally constant, and for everyg_f,\phi(g_f,-)is smooth. -
\phiis left-invariant underG(N). -
\phiis right-U_\infty-finite, that is, the space spanned byx\mapsto \phi(xu)asuvaries overU_\inftyis finite-dimensional. -
\phiis rightK_f-finite, whereK_fis one, or equivalently all, compact open subgroups ofG(\A_N^f). -
\phiis\mathcal{z}-finite, where\mathcal{z}is the centre of the universal enveloping algebra of the Lie algebra ofG(N_\infty), acting via differential operators. Equivalently\phiis annihilated by a finite index ideal of this centre, so morally\phisatisfies many differential equations of a certain type. -
For all
g_f, the functiong_\infty\mapsto \phi(g_f g_\infty)is slowly-increasing in the sense above.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.19.
An automorphic form is cuspidal, or a cusp form, if it furthermore satisfies
\int_{U(N)\backslash U(\A_N)}\phi(ux)\,du=0, where P runs through all the
proper parabolic subgroups of G defined over N and U is the unipotent
radical of P, and the integral is with respect to the measure coming from
Haar measure.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.19.
The group G(\A_N) acts on itself on the right, and this induces a left
action of its subgroup G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty on the spaces of automorphic
forms and cusp forms. The Lie algebra \mathfrak{g} of G(N_\infty) also
acts, via differential operators. Furthermore the actions of \mathfrak{g}
and U_\infty are compatible in the sense that the differential of the
U_\infty action is the action of its Lie algebra considered as a subalgebra
of \mathfrak{g}. We say that the spaces are
(G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty,\mathfrak{g})-modules.
For non-cuspidal representations, they do not decompose as a direct sum; there is a continuous spectrum which decomposes as a direct integral. We may not ever need these. As a result the definition of an automorphic representation has to be slightly modified in the non-cuspidal case.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.21.
An automorphic representation is an irreducible
(G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty,\mathfrak{g})-module isomorphic to an irreducible
subquotient of the space of automorphic forms.
14.5. Galois representations
14.6. Algebraic geometry
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
We need the definition of the canonical model over F of the Shimura curve
attached to an inner form of \GL_2 with precisely one split infinite place,
and likewise the Shimura surface associated to an inner form split at two
infinite places and ramified elsewhere.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Let K^{\avoid}/K be a Galois extension of number fields. Suppose also that
S is a finite set of places of K, and for each v\in S let
L_v/K_v be a finite Galois extension. Suppose also that T/K is a
smooth, geometrically connected curve and that for each v\in S we are given
a nonempty, \operatorname{Gal}(L_v/K_v)-invariant open subset
\Omega_v\subseteq T(L_v). Then there is a finite Galois extension L/K and
a point P\in T(L) such that:
-
L/Kis Galois and linearly disjoint fromK^{\avoid}overK. -
If
v\in Sandwis a prime ofLabovev, thenL_w/K_vis isomorphic toL_v/K_v. -
P\in\Omega_v\subseteq T(L_v)\cong T(L_w)via one suchK_v-algebra morphism; this makes sense as\Omega_vis\operatorname{Gal}(L_v/K_v)-invariant.
Note that we do not even have the definition of a curve over a field in Lean.
14.7. Algebra
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Theorem 14.26.
A cuspidal automorphic representation is an irreducible
(G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty,\mathfrak{g})-module isomorphic to an irreducible
summand of the space of cusp forms.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.20 and Definition 14.21.
The cusp forms decompose as a typically infinite direct sum of irreducible
(G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty,\mathfrak{g})-modules.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Definition 14.28
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.22.
An irreducible admissible (G(\A_N^f)\times U_\infty,\mathfrak{g})-module is a
restricted tensor product of irreducible representations \pi_v of G(N_v)
as v runs through the finite places of N, tensored with a tensor product of
irreducible (\mathfrak{g}_v,U_{\infty,v})-modules as v runs through the
infinite places of N. The representations \pi_v are unramified for all but
finitely many v.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Theorem 14.29
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Let N be a number field. A compatible family of d-dimensional Galois
representations over N is a finite set of finite places S of N, a
number field E, a monic degree d polynomial F_{\mathfrak p}(X)\in E[X]
for each finite place \mathfrak p of K not in S, and, for each prime
number \ell and field embedding \phi : E \to \overline{\mathbf{Q}}_\ell
(or essentially equivalently for each finite place of E), a continuous
homomorphism \rho:\operatorname{Gal}(\overline{K}/K)\to\GL_2(\overline{\mathbf{Q}}_\ell)
unramified outside S and the primes of K above \ell, such that
\rho(\operatorname{Frob}_{\mathfrak p}) has characteristic polynomial
P_\pi(X) if \pi lies above a prime number p\neq \ell with
p\not\in S.
- Theorem 14.1
- Definition 14.2
- Theorem 14.3
- Theorem 14.4
- Theorem 14.5
- Theorem 14.6
- Theorem 14.7
- Theorem 14.8
- Theorem 14.9
- Theorem 14.10
- Definition 14.11
- Theorem 14.12
- Definition 14.13
- Theorem 14.14
- Corollary 14.15
- Definition 14.16
- Definition 14.17
- Theorem 14.18
- Definition 14.19
- Definition 14.20
- Definition 14.21
- Definition 14.22
- Definition 14.23
- Theorem 14.24
- Definition 14.25
- Theorem 14.26
- Theorem 14.27
- Definition 14.28
- No associated Lean code or declarations.
Uses Definition 14.22, Definition 14.23, and Definition 14.28.
Given an automorphic representation \pi for an inner form of \GL_2 over a
totally real field and with reflex field E, such that \pi is weight 2
discrete series at every infinite place, there exists a compatible family of
2-dimensional Galois representations associated to \pi, with S the
places at which \pi is ramified and F_{\mathfrak p}(X) the monic
polynomial with roots the two Satake parameters for \pi at \mathfrak p.