4. Dividing FPSs
Let a\in K[[x]].
Then the FPS a is invertible in K[[x]] if and only if its constant term
\left[x^{0}\right]a is invertible in K.
Lean code for Theorem4.1●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_invertible_iff_constantCoeff.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.aPowerSeries K↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.(PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K)theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_invertible_iff_constantCoeff.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.aPowerSeries K↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.(PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K)An FPS is invertible iff its constant term is invertible. Label: prop.fps.invertible
\Longrightarrow: If ab=1, then
\left[x^0\right]a\cdot\left[x^0\right]b = \left[x^0\right](ab)=1
by the constant-term product lemma.
\Longleftarrow: If \left[x^0\right]a=a_0 is invertible, define a sequence
(b_0,b_1,b_2,\ldots) recursively by
b_0 = a_0^{-1} and
b_n = -a_0^{-1}\sum_{k=1}^n a_k b_{n-k} for n \ge 1.
Then ab = 1.
Assume that K is a field. Let a\in K[[x]].
Then the FPS a is invertible in K[[x]] if and only if
\left[x^{0}\right]a\neq0.
Lean code for Corollary4.2●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_invertible_iff_constantCoeff_ne_zero.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (aPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.aPowerSeries F↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries F≠Ne.{u} {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : Prop`a ≠ b`, or `Ne a b` is defined as `¬ (a = b)` or `a = b → False`, and asserts that `a` and `b` are not equal. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≠` in identifiers is `ne`.0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_invertible_iff_constantCoeff_ne_zero.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (aPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.aPowerSeries F↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries F≠Ne.{u} {α : Sort u} (a b : α) : Prop`a ≠ b`, or `Ne a b` is defined as `¬ (a = b)` or `a = b → False`, and asserts that `a` and `b` are not equal. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≠` in identifiers is `ne`.0**Corollary (cor.fps.invertible.field)**: Over a field, an FPS is invertible iff its constant term is nonzero. Label: cor.fps.invertible.field
An element of K is invertible in K if and only if it is nonzero, since
K is a field. Hence the corollary follows from the proposition above.
Assume that K is a field. Let f\in K[[x]]. Then the constant term of
f^{-1} equals the inverse of the constant term of f:
\left[x^{0}\right]f^{-1} = \left(\left[x^{0}\right]f\right)^{-1}.
Lean code for Lemma4.3●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_zero.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_zero.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.The constant term of the inverse of an FPS equals the inverse of its constant term. This is a direct corollary of Mathlib's `PowerSeries.constantCoeff_inv`. Label: fps_inv_coeff_zero
Direct consequence of the definition of the inverse of an FPS.
Assume that K is a field. Let f\in K[[x]]. For each n\in\mathbb{N},
\left[x^{n+1}\right]f^{-1}
= -\left(\left[x^{0}\right]f\right)^{-1}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left[x^{k+1}\right]f\cdot
\left[x^{n-k}\right]f^{-1}.
This recurrence allows computing the coefficients of f^{-1} one by one.
Lean code for Lemma4.4●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_succ.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.∑ kℕ∈ Finset.rangeFinset.range (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ`range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`., (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).nℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_succ.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.∑ kℕ∈ Finset.rangeFinset.range (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ`range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`., (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).nℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).) fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.Recurrence for coefficients of the inverse of an FPS. For n > 0: `[x^n]f⁻¹ = -(f₀)⁻¹ · ∑_{k=1}^n f_k · [x^{n-k}]f⁻¹` This is a reformulation of Mathlib's `PowerSeries.coeff_inv` that expresses the recurrence in terms of a sum over `Finset.range (n + 1)` with shifted indices, which matches the standard textbook formula. The recurrence shows that each coefficient of `f⁻¹` can be computed from: - The constant term `f₀` (which must be nonzero for `f` to be invertible) - The coefficients `f₁, f₂, ..., f_n` of `f` - The previously computed coefficients `[x^0]f⁻¹, [x^1]f⁻¹, ..., [x^{n-1}]f⁻¹` Label: fps_inv_coeff_succ
This follows from the recurrence relation for the coefficients of f^{-1}
obtained by expanding the equation f\cdot f^{-1}=1 and solving for
\left[x^{n+1}\right]f^{-1}.
Assume that K is a field. Let f\in K[[x]] be an invertible FPS.
Then the inverse of f obtained from the invertibility proof equals
f^{-1}, the inverse as defined in the power series ring.
Lean code for Lemma4.5●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_isUnit_inv_eq_inv.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) : ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_isUnit_inv_eq_inv.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) : ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.fPowerSeries F⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.Helper lemma: For an invertible FPS `f`, the unit inverse `hf.unit⁻¹` equals `f⁻¹`. This connects the `IsUnit` formulation with the direct inverse.
Both satisfy f\cdot g = 1, and inverses are unique.
Assume that K is a field. Let f\in K[[x]] be an invertible FPS. Then
\left[x^{0}\right]f^{-1} = \left(\left[x^{0}\right]f\right)^{-1}.
Lean code for Lemma4.6●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_zero_isUnit.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_zero_isUnit.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.The constant term of the inverse of an invertible FPS equals the inverse of its constant term. This is the `IsUnit` version of `fps_inv_coeff_zero`. Label: fps_inv_coeff_zero_isUnit
By the previous lemma, the inverse obtained from the invertibility proof equals
f^{-1}, so the result follows from the lemma on the constant term of the
inverse.
Assume that K is a field. Let f\in K[[x]] be an invertible FPS. For
each n\in\mathbb{N},
\left[x^{n+1}\right]f^{-1}
= -\left(\left[x^{0}\right]f\right)^{-1}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\left[x^{k+1}\right]f\cdot
\left[x^{n-k}\right]f^{-1}.
Lean code for Lemma4.7●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_succ_isUnit.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.∑ kℕ∈ Finset.rangeFinset.range (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ`range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`., (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).nℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_inv_coeff_succ_isUnit.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] (fPowerSeries F: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`FType u_2) (hfIsUnit f: IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.fPowerSeries F) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).((PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.0) fPowerSeries F)⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.∑ kℕ∈ Finset.rangeFinset.range (n : ℕ) : Finset ℕ`range n` is the set of natural numbers less than `n`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`., (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) fPowerSeries F*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).nℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).) ↑hfIsUnit f.unitIsUnit.unit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] {a : M} (h : IsUnit a) : MˣThe element of the group of units, corresponding to an element of a monoid which is a unit. When `α` is a `DivisionMonoid`, use `IsUnit.unit'` instead.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.Recurrence for coefficients of the inverse of an invertible FPS. This is the `IsUnit` version of `fps_inv_coeff_succ`. Label: fps_inv_coeff_succ_isUnit
By the previous lemma, the inverse obtained from the invertibility proof equals
f^{-1}, so the result follows from the recurrence lemma for inverse
coefficients.
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_isUnit[complete] -
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_inv[complete]
The FPS 1+x\in K[[x]] is invertible, and its inverse is
\left(1+x\right)^{-1}=\sum_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\left(-1\right)^{n}x^{n}.
Lean code for Theorem4.8●2 theorems
Associated Lean declarations
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_isUnit[complete]
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_inv[complete]
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_isUnit[complete] -
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_inv[complete]
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_isUnit.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_isUnit.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] : IsUnitIsUnit.{u_1} {M : Type u_1} [Monoid M] (a : M) : PropAn element `a : M` of a `Monoid` is a unit if it has a two-sided inverse. The actual definition says that `a` is equal to some `u : Mˣ`, where `Mˣ` is a bundled version of `IsUnit`.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.**Proposition (prop.fps.invertible.1+x)**: The FPS `1+x` is invertible, with inverse `1 - x + x^2 - x^3 + ...`. Label: prop.fps.invertible.1+x
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_inv.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun nℕ↦ (-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕtheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_inv.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun nℕ↦ (-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕThe inverse of `1+x` is `Σ_{n ∈ ℕ} (-1)^n x^n`. Note: This requires `K` to be a field to have `Inv` instance on `PowerSeries K`. Label: prop.fps.invertible.1+x
Direct computation:
(1+x)\cdot\sum_{n\geq 0}(-1)^n x^n = 1 by telescoping. All powers of
x other than 1 cancel out.
For each n\in\mathbb{Z}, we have
\left(1+x\right)^{n}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\dbinom{n}{k}x^{k}.
Lean code for Theorem4.9●2 theorems
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_newtonBinomial_nat.{u_2} {R
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.RType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ ifite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.kℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕthenite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.↑(nℕ.chooseNat.choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ`choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial coefficients. For the fact that this is the number of `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element set, see `Finset.card_powersetCard`.kℕ) elseite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_newtonBinomial_nat.{u_2} {R
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.RType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ ifite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.kℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕthenite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.↑(nℕ.chooseNat.choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ`choose n k` is the number of `k`-element subsets in an `n`-element set. Also known as binomial coefficients. For the fact that this is the number of `k`-element-subsets of an `n`-element set, see `Finset.card_powersetCard`.kℕ) elseite.{u} {α : Sort u} (c : Prop) [h : Decidable c] (t e : α) : α`if c then t else e` is notation for `ite c t e`, "if-then-else", which decides to return `t` or `e` depending on whether `c` is true or false. The explicit argument `c : Prop` does not have any actual computational content, but there is an additional `[Decidable c]` argument synthesized by typeclass inference which actually determines how to evaluate `c` to true or false. Write `if h : c then t else e` instead for a "dependent if-then-else" `dite`, which allows `t`/`e` to use the fact that `c` is true/false.0**Theorem (thm.fps.newton-binom)**: Newton's binomial formula. For each `n ∈ ℕ`, we have `(1+x)^n = Σ_{k ∈ ℕ} C(n,k) x^k`. Note: For non-negative integers, this follows from the standard binomial theorem. Label: thm.fps.newton-binom -
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_newtonBinomial_neg.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).↑↑nℕ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕtheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_newtonBinomial_neg.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).↑↑nℕ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕNewton's binomial formula for negative integer exponents over a field. The inverse of `(1+x)^n` equals `Σ C(-n,k) x^k`. Label: thm.fps.newton-binom
For n\geq 0, this is the standard binomial theorem: the sum
\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\dbinom{n}{k}x^{k} reduces to
\sum_{k=0}^{n}\dbinom{n}{k}x^{k} since \dbinom{n}{k}=0 for k>n.
For n<0, we have -n\in\mathbb{N}, so the corollary for negative natural
powers, applied to -n, yields
\left(1+x\right)^{-(-n)} = \sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\dbinom{-(-n)}{k}x^k,
which rewrites as
\left(1+x\right)^n = \sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\dbinom{n}{k}x^k.
Let n\in\mathbb{C} and k\in\mathbb{Z}. Then
\dbinom{-n}{k}=\left(-1\right)^{k}\dbinom{k+n-1}{k}.
Lean code for Theorem4.10●2 theorems
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.binomUpperNegation.{u_2} {R
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.RType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.RType u_2] [NatPowAssocNatPowAssoc.{u_2} (M : Type u_2) [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] : PropA mixin for power-associative multiplication.RType u_2] (rR: RType u_2) (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).rR)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).rR+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.↑kℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕtheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.binomUpperNegation.{u_2} {R
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.RType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.RType u_2] [NatPowAssocNatPowAssoc.{u_2} (M : Type u_2) [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] : PropA mixin for power-associative multiplication.RType u_2] (rR: RType u_2) (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).rR)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).rR+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.↑kℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ**Theorem (thm.binom.upneg-n)**: Upper negation formula for binomial coefficients. For `r` in a BinomialRing `R` and `k ∈ ℕ`, we have `C(-r, k) = (-1)^k * C(r+k-1, k)`. Note: In Mathlib, generalized binomial coefficients are defined via `Ring.choose` for `BinomialRing`s. This generalizes the classical formula for `n ∈ ℂ`. Label: thm.binom.upneg-n
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.binomUpperNegation_int (n
ℤ: ℤInt : TypeThe integers. This type is special-cased by the compiler and overridden with an efficient implementation. The runtime has a special representation for `Int` that stores “small” signed numbers directly, while larger numbers use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)). A “small number” is an integer that can be encoded with one fewer bits than the platform's pointer size (i.e. 63 bits on 64-bit architectures and 31 bits on 32-bit architectures).) (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).nℤ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).↑kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℤ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕtheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.binomUpperNegation_int (n
ℤ: ℤInt : TypeThe integers. This type is special-cased by the compiler and overridden with an efficient implementation. The runtime has a special representation for `Int` that stores “small” signed numbers directly, while larger numbers use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)). A “small number” is an integer that can be encoded with one fewer bits than the platform's pointer size (i.e. 63 bits on 64-bit architectures and 31 bits on 32-bit architectures).) (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).nℤ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).↑kℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℤ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕSpecialization of `binomUpperNegation` to integers. For `n ∈ ℤ` and `k ∈ ℕ`, we have `C(-n, k) = (-1)^k * C(k+n-1, k)`. Label: thm.binom.upneg-n
If k<0, then both \dbinom{-n}{k} and \dbinom{k+n-1}{k} are 0.
For k\geq 0, expand using the definition and observe that the numerators
differ by a factor of \left(-1\right)^{k}.
For each n\in\mathbb{N}, we have
\left(1+x\right)^{-n}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\left(-1\right)^{k}\dbinom{n+k-1}{k}x^{k}.
Lean code for Theorem4.11●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_pow_neg.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ (-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.↑(Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).↑nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.↑kℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_pow_neg.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ (-1) ^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.↑(Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).↑nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.↑kℕ-HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).1)HSub.hSub.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HSub α β γ] : α → β → γ`a - b` computes the difference of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. * For natural numbers, this operator saturates at 0: `a - b = 0` when `a ≤ b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `sub` (when used as a binary operator).kℕ)**Proposition (prop.fps.anti-newton-binom)**: For each `n ∈ ℕ`, we have `(1+x)^{-n} = Σ_{k ∈ ℕ} (-1)^k * C(n+k-1, k) * x^k`. Note: We express this using the inverse since PowerSeries over a general ring doesn't have integer power operations. Label: prop.fps.anti-newton-binom
By induction on n.
Induction base: \left(1+x\right)^{-0} = 1, and
\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}} (-1)^k \dbinom{0+k-1}{k} x^k = 1
since \dbinom{k-1}{k} = 0 for all k > 0.
Induction step: Assume the formula holds for n = j. We must prove it for
n = j+1. We have
\left(1+x\right)^{-(j+1)} = \left(1+x\right)^{-j} \cdot \left(1+x\right)^{-1}.
Using the induction hypothesis and multiplying by 1+x, it suffices to show
\left(1+x\right)^{-j} = \left(\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}} (-1)^k \dbinom{j+k}{k} x^k\right) \cdot \left(1+x\right).
Expanding the right hand side, using Pascal's identity
\dbinom{j+k}{k} = \dbinom{j+k-1}{k-1} + \dbinom{j+k-1}{k} and collecting
terms, the \dbinom{j+k-1}{k-1} terms telescope, and we obtain
\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}} (-1)^k \dbinom{j+k-1}{k} x^k = \left(1+x\right)^{-j}
by the induction hypothesis.
For each n\in\mathbb{N}, we have
\left(1+x\right)^{-n}=\sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}}\dbinom{-n}{k}x^{k}.
Lean code for Corollary4.12●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_pow_neg'.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).↑↑nℕ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕtheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_onePlusX_pow_neg'.{u_2} {F
Type u_2: Type u_2A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [FieldField.{u} (K : Type u) : Type uA `Field` is a `CommRing` with multiplicative inverses for nonzero elements. An instance of `Field K` includes maps `ratCast : ℚ → K` and `qsmul : ℚ → K → K`. Those two fields are needed to implement the `DivisionRing K → Algebra ℚ K` instance since we need to control the specific definitions for some special cases of `K` (in particular `K = ℚ` itself). See also note [forgetful inheritance]. If the field has positive characteristic `p`, our division by zero convention forces `ratCast (1 / p) = 1 / 0 = 0`.FType u_2] [BinomialRingBinomialRing.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) [AddCommMonoid R] [Pow R ℕ] : Type u_1A binomial ring is a ring for which ascending Pochhammer evaluations are uniquely divisible by suitable factorials. We define this notion as a mixin for additive commutative monoids with natural number powers, but retain the ring name. We introduce `Ring.multichoose` as the uniquely defined quotient.FType u_2] (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1 +HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.⁻¹Inv.inv.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Inv α] : α → α`a⁻¹` computes the inverse of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `⁻¹` in identifiers is `inv`.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.nℕ=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.mkPowerSeries.mk.{u_2} {R : Type u_2} (f : ℕ → R) : PowerSeries RConstructor for formal power series.fun kℕ↦ Ring.chooseRing.choose.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [AddCommGroupWithOne R] [Pow R ℕ] [BinomialRing R] (r : R) (n : ℕ) : RThe binomial coefficient `choose r n` generalizes the natural number `Nat.choose` function, interpreted in terms of choosing without replacement.(Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).-Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).↑↑nℕ)Neg.neg.{u} {α : Type u} [self : Neg α] : α → α`-a` computes the negative or opposite of `a`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `-` in identifiers is `neg` (when used as a unary operator).kℕ**Corollary (cor.fps.anti-newton-binom-2)**: For each `n ∈ ℕ`, we have `(1+x)^{-n} = Σ_{k ∈ ℕ} C(-n, k) * x^k`. Label: cor.fps.anti-newton-binom-2
The previous proposition yields
\left(1+x\right)^{-n} = \sum_{k\in\mathbb{N}} (-1)^k \dbinom{n+k-1}{k} x^k.
By the upper-negation theorem, we have
(-1)^k \dbinom{n+k-1}{k} = (-1)^k \dbinom{k+n-1}{k} = \dbinom{-n}{k}.
Let a=\left(a_{0},a_{1},a_{2},\ldots\right) be an FPS whose constant term
a_{0} is 0. Then \dfrac{a}{x} is defined to be the FPS
\left(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3},\ldots\right).
Lean code for Definition4.13●1 definition
Associated Lean declarations
-
defdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
def AlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0 → PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1def AlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0 → PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1Division of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-x
Let a\in K[[x]] with \left[x^0\right]a=0. Then for each
n\in\mathbb{N},
\left[x^{n}\right]\frac{a}{x} = \left[x^{n+1}\right]a.
Lean code for Lemma4.14●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.coeff_divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.nℕ) (PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhaPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0) =Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) aPowerSeries Ktheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.coeff_divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.nℕ) (PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhaPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0) =Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.(HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.nℕ+HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.1)HAdd.hAdd.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HAdd α β γ] : α → β → γ`a + b` computes the sum of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `+` in identifiers is `add`.) aPowerSeries KThe coefficient of `x^n` in `a/x` is the coefficient of `x^{n+1}` in `a`.
By definition, \frac{a}{x}=(a_1,a_2,a_3,\ldots), so its n-th
coefficient is a_{n+1}=[x^{n+1}]a.
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_iff[complete]
Let a,b\in K[[x]] be two FPSs. Then a=xb if and only if
\left[x^{0}\right]a=0 and b=\dfrac{a}{x}.
Lean code for Theorem4.15●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_iff[complete]
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_iff[complete]
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_iff.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KbPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0 ∧And (a b : Prop) : Prop`And a b`, or `a ∧ b`, is the conjunction of propositions. It can be constructed and destructed like a pair: if `ha : a` and `hb : b` then `⟨ha, hb⟩ : a ∧ b`, and if `h : a ∧ b` then `h.left : a` and `h.right : b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∧` in identifiers is `and`. * The recommended spelling of `/\` in identifiers is `and` (prefer `∧` over `/\`).∃ (hPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0), bPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_iff.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KbPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0 ∧And (a b : Prop) : Prop`And a b`, or `a ∧ b`, is the conjunction of propositions. It can be constructed and destructed like a pair: if `ha : a` and `hb : b` then `⟨ha, hb⟩ : a ∧ b`, and if `h : a ∧ b` then `h.left : a` and `h.right : b`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∧` in identifiers is `and`. * The recommended spelling of `/\` in identifiers is `and` (prefer `∧` over `/\`).∃ (hPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0), bPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0**Proposition (prop.fps.div-by-x-inverts)**: `a = x * b` iff `a` has zero constant term and `b = a/x`. Label: prop.fps.div-by-x-inverts
This follows directly from the definitions.
Let a\in K[[x]] with \left[x^0\right]a=0. Then
a = x\cdot\frac{a}{x}.
Lean code for Lemma4.16●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) : aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhaPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_eq_X_mul_divByX.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) : aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-xaPowerSeries KhaPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0If `a.constantCoeff = 0`, then `a = X * (a/x)`. Label: prop.fps.div-by-x-inverts (helper)
This follows from the previous proposition: setting b=\frac{a}{x}, the
right-to-left direction gives a=xb.
For any FPS b\in K[[x]], we have \frac{xb}{x}=b.
Lean code for Lemma4.17●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_divByX_X_mul[complete]
-
AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_divByX_X_mul[complete]
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_divByX_X_mul.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (bPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-x(HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.⋯ =Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.bPowerSeries Ktheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_divByX_X_mul.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (bPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : PowerSeries.divByXAlgebraicCombinatorics.PowerSeries.divByX.{u_1} {K : Type u_1} [CommRing K] (a : PowerSeries K) : PowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0 → PowerSeries KDivision of an FPS by `x`, defined when the constant term is zero. Given `a = (a_0, a_1, a_2, ...)` with `a_0 = 0`, returns `(a_1, a_2, a_3, ...)`. Label: def.fps.div-by-x(HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.⋯ =Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.bPowerSeries K`(X * b) / X = b`. Label: prop.fps.div-by-x-inverts (helper)
For each n\in\mathbb{N},
[x^n]\frac{xb}{x}=[x^{n+1}](xb)=[x^n]b,
by the coefficient formula for \frac{a}{x} and the coefficient formula for
xb.
Let a\in K[[x]] be an FPS with \left[x^{0}\right]a=0. Then there exists
an h\in K[[x]] such that a=xh.
Lean code for Lemma4.18●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_exists_X_mul_of_constantCoeff_zero.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) : ∃ hPowerSeries K, aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.hPowerSeries Ktheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_exists_X_mul_of_constantCoeff_zero.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (haPowerSeries.constantCoeff a = 0: PowerSeries.constantCoeffPowerSeries.constantCoeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries R →+* RThe constant coefficient of a formal power series.aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) : ∃ hPowerSeries K, aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.hPowerSeries K**Lemma (lem.fps.g=xh)**: If an FPS `a` has zero constant term, then there exists an FPS `h` such that `a = x * h`. Label: lem.fps.g=xh
The FPS \frac{a}{x} is well-defined because the constant term of a is
0. Set h=\frac{a}{x}. Then the lemma on reconstructing a series from its
quotient by x gives a = x\cdot h.
Let k\in\mathbb{N}. Let a\in K[[x]] be any FPS. Then the first k
coefficients of the FPS x^{k}a are 0.
Lean code for Lemma4.19●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_X_pow_mul_eq_zero.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hmm < k: mℕ<LT.lt.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LT α] : α → α → PropThe less-than relation: `x < y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `<` in identifiers is `lt`.kℕ) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_X_pow_mul_eq_zero.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (aPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hmm < k: mℕ<LT.lt.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LT α] : α → α → PropThe less-than relation: `x < y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `<` in identifiers is `lt`.kℕ) : (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0**Lemma (lem.fps.first-n-coeffs-of-xna)**: The first `k` coefficients of `x^k * a` are zero. Label: lem.fps.first-n-coeffs-of-xna
If m<k, then
\left[x^m\right](x^k a)
= \sum_{i=0}^{m} \left[x^i\right](x^k)\cdot \left[x^{m-i}\right]a.
But \left[x^i\right](x^k)=0 for every i\le m<k, so each summand is
0.
Let k\in\mathbb{N}. Let f\in K[[x]] be any FPS. Then the first k
coefficients of f are 0 if and only if f is a multiple of x^k.
Lean code for Lemma4.20●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_first_k_coeffs_zero_iff_X_pow_dvd.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (fPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : (∀ mℕ< kℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) fPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) ↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ∣Dvd.dvd.{u_1} {α : Type u_1} [self : Dvd α] : α → α → PropDivisibility. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) means that there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∣` in identifiers is `dvd`.fPowerSeries Ktheorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_first_k_coeffs_zero_iff_X_pow_dvd.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (kℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (fPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) : (∀ mℕ< kℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) fPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) ↔Iff (a b : Prop) : PropIf and only if, or logical bi-implication. `a ↔ b` means that `a` implies `b` and vice versa. By `propext`, this implies that `a` and `b` are equal and hence any expression involving `a` is equivalent to the corresponding expression with `b` instead. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `↔` in identifiers is `iff`. * The recommended spelling of `<->` in identifiers is `iff` (prefer `↔` over `<->`).PowerSeries.XPowerSeries.X.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] : PowerSeries RThe variable of the formal power series ring.^HPow.hPow.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HPow α β γ] : α → β → γ`a ^ b` computes `a` to the power of `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `^` in identifiers is `pow`.kℕ∣Dvd.dvd.{u_1} {α : Type u_1} [self : Dvd α] : α → α → PropDivisibility. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) means that there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∣` in identifiers is `dvd`.fPowerSeries K**Lemma (lem.fps.muls-of-xn)**: The first `k` coefficients of `f` are zero iff `f` is a multiple of `x^k`. Label: lem.fps.muls-of-xn
\Longleftarrow: This is the previous lemma.
\Longrightarrow: If the first k coefficients of f vanish, then
f = \sum_{n\ge k} f_n x^n = x^k \sum_{n\ge k} f_n x^{n-k}, so f is a
multiple of x^k.
Let a,f,g\in K[[x]] be three FPSs. Let n\in\mathbb{N}. Assume that
\left[x^{m}\right]f=\left[x^{m}\right]g for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}. Then
\left[x^{m}\right](af)=\left[x^{m}\right](ag) for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}.
Lean code for Lemma4.21●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_mul_eq_of_coeff_eq.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KfPowerSeries KgPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (h∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) f = (PowerSeries.coeff m) g: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) fPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) gPowerSeries K) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.fPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.gPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_mul_eq_of_coeff_eq.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KfPowerSeries KgPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (h∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) f = (PowerSeries.coeff m) g: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) fPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) gPowerSeries K) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.fPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.gPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.**Lemma (lem.fps.prod.irlv.fg)**: If the first `n+1` coefficients of `f` and `g` agree, then the first `n+1` coefficients of `a*f` and `a*g` agree. Label: lem.fps.prod.irlv.fg
Fix m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}. For each j\in\{0,1,\ldots,m\}, we have
j\le m\le n, hence \left[x^j\right]f=\left[x^j\right]g. Expanding the
coefficient of a product therefore gives the same finite sum for
\left[x^m\right](af) and \left[x^m\right](ag).
Let u,v\in K[[x]] be two FPSs such that v is a multiple of u. Let
n\in\mathbb{N}. Assume \left[x^{m}\right]u=0 for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}. Then \left[x^{m}\right]v=0 for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}.
Lean code for Lemma4.22●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_zero_of_multiple.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (uPowerSeries KvPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hdvdu ∣ v: uPowerSeries K∣Dvd.dvd.{u_1} {α : Type u_1} [self : Dvd α] : α → α → PropDivisibility. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) means that there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∣` in identifiers is `dvd`.vPowerSeries K) (hu∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) u = 0: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) uPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) vPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_zero_of_multiple.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (uPowerSeries KvPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hdvdu ∣ v: uPowerSeries K∣Dvd.dvd.{u_1} {α : Type u_1} [self : Dvd α] : α → α → PropDivisibility. `a ∣ b` (typed as `\|`) means that there is some `c` such that `b = a * c`. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `∣` in identifiers is `dvd`.vPowerSeries K) (hu∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) u = 0: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) uPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) vPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.0**Lemma (lem.fps.prod.irlv.mul)**: If `v` is a multiple of `u`, and the first `n+1` coefficients of `u` are zero, then the first `n+1` coefficients of `v` are zero. Label: lem.fps.prod.irlv.mul
Write v=ua. Since \left[x^m\right]u=0=\left[x^m\right]0 for each
m\le n, the previous lemma applied to f=u and g=0 yields
\left[x^m\right](au)=\left[x^m\right](a\cdot 0)=0. Because v=ua=au,
the same holds for v.
Let a,b,c,d\in K[[x]] be four FPSs. Let n\in\mathbb{N}. Assume
\left[x^{m}\right]a=\left[x^{m}\right]b and
\left[x^{m}\right]c=\left[x^{m}\right]d for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}. Then
\left[x^{m}\right](ac)=\left[x^{m}\right](bd) for each
m\in\{0,1,\ldots,n\}.
Lean code for Lemma4.23●1 theorem
Associated Lean declarations
-
theoremdefined in AlgebraicCombinatorics/DividingFPS.leancomplete
theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_mul_eq_of_both_coeff_eq.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KbPowerSeries KcPowerSeries KdPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hab∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) a = (PowerSeries.coeff m) b: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) bPowerSeries K) (hcd∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) c = (PowerSeries.coeff m) d: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) cPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) dPowerSeries K) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.cPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.dPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.theorem AlgebraicCombinatorics.fps_coeff_mul_eq_of_both_coeff_eq.{u_1} {K
Type u_1: Type u_1A type universe. `Type ≡ Type 0`, `Type u ≡ Sort (u + 1)`.} [CommRingCommRing.{u} (α : Type u) : Type uA commutative ring is a ring with commutative multiplication.KType u_1] (aPowerSeries KbPowerSeries KcPowerSeries KdPowerSeries K: PowerSeriesPowerSeries.{u_1} (R : Type u_1) : Type u_1Formal power series over a coefficient type `R`KType u_1) (nℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) (hab∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) a = (PowerSeries.coeff m) b: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) aPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) bPowerSeries K) (hcd∀ m ≤ n, (PowerSeries.coeff m) c = (PowerSeries.coeff m) d: ∀ mℕ≤ nℕ, (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) cPowerSeries K=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) dPowerSeries K) (mℕ: ℕNat : TypeThe natural numbers, starting at zero. This type is special-cased by both the kernel and the compiler, and overridden with an efficient implementation. Both use a fast arbitrary-precision arithmetic library (usually [GMP](https://gmplib.org/)); at runtime, `Nat` values that are sufficiently small are unboxed.) : mℕ≤LE.le.{u} {α : Type u} [self : LE α] : α → α → PropThe less-equal relation: `x ≤ y` Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `≤` in identifiers is `le`. * The recommended spelling of `<=` in identifiers is `le` (prefer `≤` over `<=`).nℕ→ (PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.aPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.cPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.=Eq.{u_1} {α : Sort u_1} : α → α → PropThe equality relation. It has one introduction rule, `Eq.refl`. We use `a = b` as notation for `Eq a b`. A fundamental property of equality is that it is an equivalence relation. ``` variable (α : Type) (a b c d : α) variable (hab : a = b) (hcb : c = b) (hcd : c = d) example : a = d := Eq.trans (Eq.trans hab (Eq.symm hcb)) hcd ``` Equality is much more than an equivalence relation, however. It has the important property that every assertion respects the equivalence, in the sense that we can substitute equal expressions without changing the truth value. That is, given `h1 : a = b` and `h2 : p a`, we can construct a proof for `p b` using substitution: `Eq.subst h1 h2`. Example: ``` example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := Eq.subst h1 h2 example (α : Type) (a b : α) (p : α → Prop) (h1 : a = b) (h2 : p a) : p b := h1 ▸ h2 ``` The triangle in the second presentation is a macro built on top of `Eq.subst` and `Eq.symm`, and you can enter it by typing `\t`. For more information: [Equality](https://lean-lang.org/theorem_proving_in_lean4/quantifiers_and_equality.html#equality) Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `=` in identifiers is `eq`.(PowerSeries.coeffPowerSeries.coeff.{u_1} {R : Type u_1} [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : PowerSeries R →ₗ[R] RThe `n`th coefficient of a formal power series.mℕ) (HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.bPowerSeries K*HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.dPowerSeries K)HMul.hMul.{u, v, w} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : outParam (Type w)} [self : HMul α β γ] : α → β → γ`a * b` computes the product of `a` and `b`. The meaning of this notation is type-dependent. Conventions for notations in identifiers: * The recommended spelling of `*` in identifiers is `mul`.**Lemma (lem.fps.prod.irlv.cong-mul)**: If the first `n+1` coefficients of `a` and `b` agree, and the first `n+1` coefficients of `c` and `d` agree, then the first `n+1` coefficients of `a*c` and `b*d` agree. Label: lem.fps.prod.irlv.cong-mul
The difference ac-bc=(a-b)c is a multiple of a-b, and the coefficients
of a-b up to degree n vanish. The previous lemma therefore gives
\left[x^m\right](ac)=\left[x^m\right](bc) for m\le n.
Applying the same argument to bc-bd=b(c-d) shows
\left[x^m\right](bc)=\left[x^m\right](bd) for m\le n.
Combining the two equalities yields the claim.